Test Series - statement and argument

Test Number 8/12

Q: . Statement: Should all refugees, who make unauthorized entry into a country, be forced to go 
back to their homeland?
Arguments:
I. Yes. They make their colonies and occupy a lot of land.
II. No. They leave their homes because of hunger or some terror and on human grounds, 
should not be forced to go back.
A. Only argument I is strong
B. Only argument II is strong
C. Either I or II is strong
D. Neither I nor II is strong
Solution: Clearly, refugees are people forced out of their homeland by some misery and need shelter 
desperately. So, argument II holds. Argument I against the statement is vague.
Q:  Statement: Should India create a huge oil reserve like some Western countries to face 
difficult situations in future?
Arguments:
I. No. There is no need to block huge amount of foreign exchange and keep the money 
idle.
II. Yes. This will help India withstand shocks of sudden rise in oil prices due to unforeseen 
circumstances.
A. Only argument I is strong
B. Only argument II is strong
C. Either I or II is strong
D. Neither I nor II is strong
Solution: Oil, being an essential commodity, our country must keep it in reserve. So, argument I is 
vague, while argument II holds as it provides a substantial reason for the same.
Q:  Statement: Should judiciary be independent of the executive?
Arguments:
I. Yes. This would help curb the unlawful activities of the executive.
II. No. The executive would not be able to take bold measures.
A. Only argument I is strong
B. Only argument II is strong
C. Either I or II is strong
D. Neither I nor II is strong
Solution: Clearly, independent judiciary is necessary for impartial judgement so that the Executive does 
not take wrong measures. So, only argument I holds.
Q: Statement: Should people with educational qualification higher than the optimum 
requirements be debarred from seeking jobs?
Arguments:
I. No. It will further aggravate the problem of educated unemployment.
II. Yes. It creates complexes among employees and affects the work adversely.
III. No. This goes against the basic rights of the individuals.
IV. Yes. This will increase productivity.
A. Only I is strong
B. Only II is strong
C. Only I and II are strong
D. Only III is strong
Solution: The issue discussed in the statement is nowhere related to increase in unemployment, as the 
number of vacancies filled in will remain the same. Also, in a working place, it is the 
performance of the individual that matters and that makes him more or less wanted, and not 
his educational qualifications. So, neither I nor II holds strong. Besides, the needs of a job are 
laid down in the desired qualifications for the job. So, recruitment of more qualified people 
cannot augment productivity. Thus, IV also does not hold strong. However, it is the right of an 
individual to get the post for which he fulfils the eligibility criteria, whatever be his extra 
merits. Hence, argument III holds strong.
Q: Statement: Should India go in for computerization in all possible sectors?
Arguments:
I. Yes. It will bring efficiency and accuracy in the work.
II. No. It will be an injustice to the monumental human resources which are at present 
underutilized.
III. No. Computerization demands a lot of money. We should not waste money on it.
IV. Yes. When advanced countries are introducing computers in every field, how can India 
afford to lag behind?
A. Only I is strong
B. Only II is strong
C. Only I and II are strong
D. Only I, II and III are strong
Solution: Clearly, the need of today is to put to better use the underutilized human resources. 
Computers with better and speedy efficiency can accomplish this. So, argument I holds, while 
II does not. Computerization is a much beneficial project and investment in it is not at all a 
waste. So, III is not strong. Further, development in a new field is not a matter of merely 
following up other countries. So, IV also does not hold strong.
Q: Statement: Should trade unions be banned completely?
Arguments:
I. Yes. Workers can concentrate on production.
II. No. This is the only way through which employees can put their demands before the 
management.
III. Yes. Employees get their illegal demands fulfilled through these unions.
IV. No. Trade unions are not banned in other economically advanced countries.
A. Only I is strong
B. Only II is strong
C. Only I and II are strong
D. Only I, II and III are strong
Solution: Clearly, trade unions provide a common platform for the workers to voice their demands and 
protests and thus ensure that they are not subdued or exploited. So, argument II holds 
strong, while I and III do not. Besides, the idea of imitation of other countries in the 
implementation of a certain policy holds no relevance. So, argument IV also does not hold 
strong.

You Have Score    /6